Kamala & Walz Plot Digital Muzzle for America
How long before "misinformation" means whatever the government doesn't like?
Sane Perspective
Big Brother's Favorite Candidates
Kamala Harris and Tim Walz want to play censorship gods like Brazil, using the government to decide what you can and can't say on social media. They're not calling for outright bans on platforms (yet), but they’re all-in on de-platforming people who dare challenge their narrative, like Brazilian politicians who tried to silence Elon Musk’s X. Harris even cheered when Trump got kicked off Twitter, forgetting that the First Amendment exists for a good reason. These guys think free speech only applies if it doesn’t hurt their feelings or “endanger democracy,” which is woke code for "we’ll shut you up if we don’t like what you're saying." And, of course, their go-to excuse for stomping on rights? The magical fairy tale of “hate speech” and “misinformation.” What’s next, banning you from all social platforms if you disagree with Kamala's opinion on breakfast cereals? This creeping censorship isn’t about protecting anyone; it’s about control, plain and simple.
Woke Perspective
Elite Leaders Know Best
Kamala Harris, Tim Walz, and Barack Obama are leading the charge to cleanse the internet of harmful "misinformation" and "hate speech"—to protect democracy. By following Brazil’s bold example of blocking platforms like X (formerly Twitter), they aim to protect vulnerable communities from toxic ideas. Sure, conservatives cry "free speech!" but that’s just white supremacy trying to survive in the digital age. Under a Harris-Walz administration, cross-platform deplatforming would ensure that dangerous voices can’t escape accountability. It's time to reshape the Constitution and promote inclusive, safe online spaces for everyone except fascists.